Tools

Models you can run, free.

First-principles calculators — no sign-up, no email wall. Change the inputs and watch the model move. Built to teach the relationship, not to gate a download.

Unit economics

CAC payback · LTV : CAC

The two numbers that decide whether growth is affordable: how long a customer takes to pay back what it cost to acquire them, and how much they return over their life.

12.0months to pay back CACwithin 12 months
8.3×LTV : CAC ratioat or above 3×
Gross profit / customer / year
$9,000
Avg. customer lifetime
8.3 yrs
Lifetime value (gross)
$75,000

The model, in plain terms. A customer is worth their yearly gross profit — ARR × gross margin — for as long as they stay, and they stay 1 ÷ churn years on average.

  • Payback = CAC ÷ (annual gross profit ÷ 12) — months of margin to earn back what acquisition cost. Under ~12 is healthy.
  • LTV = annual gross profit × lifetime, and LTV : CAC is the return on an acquisition dollar. 3× or better is the common bar.

Illustrative — a first-principles model, not a benchmark dataset. Blended inputs hide the channel-level gaps that Attribution & Channel Economics unpacks.

RevOps maturity

4 foundations · 1–5

Rate four foundations — data, process, tooling, insight. Your maturity is gated by the weakest one, so the assessment points at the next move rather than the average.

Data foundation how trustworthy the underlying data is2/5

A CRM of record, but dirty and inconsistent

Process & lifecycle how consistently work actually runs2/5

Written down but not followed

Tooling & integration how connected the stack is2/5

A core CRM with manual exports around it

Measurement & insight how much the numbers can be trusted2/5

Basic reporting, argued over monthly

Overall stageDeveloping2.0 / 5 across four foundations
Data foundation
Process & lifecycle
Tooling & integration
Measurement & insight

Your weakest foundation is data foundation. Maturity is gated by the lowest one — that’s the next move, not the highest one.

A self-assessment, not a score to defend — the value is seeing which foundation lags. The pattern shows up across the case studies: fix the foundation first.

Attribution readiness

10 conditions

Channel-level CPA is only as trustworthy as the attribution beneath it. Check the conditions you actually meet; the gaps are what to fix before you reallocate budget.

ReadinessNot ready0 / 10 conditions met
Close these before you trust the CPA:
  • Multi-touch attribution is in place — not last-touch only
  • The attribution window matches the sales motion (≈90d SMB, 180–365d enterprise)
  • Marketing spend is captured per channel, consistently
  • Cost basis is defined (program-only vs. fully-loaded) and applied uniformly
  • Closed-won revenue is joined back to its source
  • Source / UTM tracking is enforced at the point of capture
+4 more

Attribution is the layer channel CPA rides on; miss these and the number quietly misprices every channel. The reasoning is in Attribution & Channel Economics.